The UUWorld news about a Unitarian Universalist fellowship on the United States Air Force base in Kandahar in Afghanistan brought up two unrelated thoughts.
The first is bittersweet. New congregation development has ground as low as it ever has. Leave it to this "situational congregation" (I don't get a sense that it's intended to last past the deployment of US troops) to dredge up a much reviled mode of organization: the 10-member fellowship. (The branch church is another active model, but for another time.)
The second is more sensitive. The relative boom in Unitarian Universalist military chaplains doesn't surprise me: military personnel and their families -- and I grew up in a military family -- need pastoral care; settlements are few; and there are surely affirming challenges and perks that the chaplaincy has that parish or other ministries don't have. But it seems to me that Unitarian Univeraslists have followed the cultural rising tide with respect to the military, and with hardly a peep of introspection. More fodder to consider if Unitarian Universalism closely follows culture rather than speaking to it.