Even though we have data and options for forming new Unitarian Universalist churches, I didn't present "airdrops" nor "strawberry runner" models for serious consideration. I said the Fellowship Movement era was over without any desire to duplicate it.
The reality is that the Unitarian Universalist today have few resources for church planting : economic, appropriate talent, organizational culture. This may change, but we don't have it right now.
One of the things we do have is a historic surplus of ministers, and an undersupply of parish ministries. Should we wonder when we see little, "emerging" congregations coalescing around a minister from day one? (Did you notice this in the recent UUWorld article about emerging congregations?) Planted not in the "ideal" place, but one chosen for personal reasons, or from necessity. This may very well become the model for today. Will we let them go it alone?