January 17, 2015. I'm not writing a new post about the Starr King School for the Ministry crises, but the newest blowup has driven traffic to this article, first published on June 2, 2014. I do have some added questions:
- Who benefits from the status quo?
- What is the role of money -- paid out, raised and possibly withheld -- play in these crises?
- What named, tangible benefits, other than the emotional, does Starr King provide to the Unitarian Universalist community?
- What is the role of SKSM's prior reputation? The role of a (possibly) over-professionalized ministry? The different approaches to ministry in different generations? West coast vs. East coast vs. "North coast"?
Feel free to comment.
So, the Unitarian Universalist-o-sphere is blowing up around a crisis at Starr King School for the Ministry, a Unitarian Universalist-related graduate seminary in Berkeley, California.
I would go into detail about the crisis, but there aren't many details to be had, and much of the commentary -- including an appeal letter from incoming president, Rosemary Bray McNatt, lately the minister of Fourth Universalist, New York -- takes place on Facebook, and that's hardly a reliable archive.
The nut is, or seems to be, this: someone gave confidential documents about the presidential search process to those outside the process, including other Unitarian Universalists, the press and the theological seminaries accrediting board. (I have no idea what these documents say.) The Starr King board has made an inquiry. Two graduating Starr King students have not been graduated (a contingent graduation) pending further investigation. Unsubstantiated reports tell of two board members resigning. Past UUA moderator Gini Courter has established a legal defense fund for the students, who are being represented by lawyers. Talk of ethics, boundaries and leadership abound, with a predicable amount of expressed horror and people supporting their friends.
Rosemary Bray McNatt's open letter is here. A statement from the lawyers representing the students is here.
Not suprizingly, web searches have brought readers to a post I wrote about Starr King in 2007. My basic opinion about the school hasn't changed, and (plainly) I have a hard time caring if it prospers or dies. This blog post is not about Starr King School for the Ministry. It's about Unitarian Universalist self-conception.
- This is the second time in a year (or so) that an unnamed consultant has been brought in to handle major Unitarian Universalist institutional conflict. Who is the consultant? A forthcoming introduction would go far to instill confidence that the consultant is qualified and has no conflict of interest.
- The lawyers refer to 'an investigator for the board’s law firm' which, if true, is alarming. But is very much in character with Unitarian Universalist culture which claims to create bold leaders yet makes the formation process a gauntlet of circumspection, wildly uneven power arrangements and keeping your head down. You have to pass to play. But you can't build bravery though fear. (So no points to Gini Couter for "doing the right thing." I've never seen so many good people sigh relief as when she stopped being Moderator. For some reason, people are afraid of her. If this is Unitarian Universalism, you can keep it. But she's out of office and the rest of us are still here.)
- Which is, I believe, why Unitarian Universalist ministers are so deeply conformist, at least in public, and why ministers close ranks with the speed and force of a bear trap. Can you think of another denomination that avoids public fights so hard? It's particularly bitter when you consider the brave souls we lionize, say, like John Haynes Holmes.
- When you spend all you time being "revolutionary" expect revolutionary justice. As in, innocent blood on the guillotine. But we aren't that revolutionary, and weirdness is not a substitute. I'll take sober, thoughtful leadership any day. Our rhetoric doesn't match our reality, even a reasonable aspiration.
- There's a Yiddish word you should learn if you don't know it. Mishigas. Crazy-nonsense. Boy, do we have it. Good, self-differentiated people smell it and they stay away or leave. Remember that the next time you hear someone mew about the Millenials being our future.
As I said, this is far past a Starr King issue, but it is a test for Unitarian Universalist leadership, and we should all be watching.